jake

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Advertisement

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com

Mar. 5th, 2007

jake

The best Chairman's Letter of the year!

Warren Buffett's annual Chairman's Letter for 2006 is a rollicking ride! He seems like a pretty cool dude, except for living in Omaha! It's sort of hard to summarize the letter, but it includes a fascinating history of, well, it starts with Lloyd's of London.
Our tale begins around 1688, when Edward Lloyd opened a small coffee house in London. Though no Starbucks, his shop was destined to achieve worldwide fame because of the commercial activities of its clientele – shipowners, merchants and venturesome British capitalists. As these parties sipped Edward’s brew, they began to write contracts transferring the risk of a disaster at sea from the owners of ships and their cargo to the capitalists, who wagered that a given voyage would be completed without incident. These capitalists eventually became known as “underwriters at Lloyd’s.”

Though many people believe Lloyd’s to be an insurance company, that is not the case. It is instead a place where many member-insurers transact business, just as they did centuries ago.

Over time, the underwriters solicited passive investors to join in syndicates. Additionally, the business broadened beyond marine risks into every imaginable form of insurance, including exotic coverages that spread the fame of Lloyd’s far and wide. The underwriters left the coffee house, found grander quarters and formalized some rules of association. And those persons who passively backed the underwriters became known as “names.”

Eventually, the names came to include many thousands of people from around the world, who joined expecting to pick up some extra change without effort or serious risk. True, prospective names were always solemnly told that they would have unlimited and everlasting liability for the consequences of their syndicate’s underwriting – “down to the last cufflink,” as the quaint description went. But that warning came to be viewed as perfunctory. Three hundred years of retained cufflinks acted as a powerful sedative to the names poised to sign up.

Then came asbestos. When its prospective costs were added to the tidal wave of environmental and product claims that surfaced in the 1980s, Lloyd’s began to implode. Policies written decades earlier – and largely forgotten about – were developing huge losses. No one could intelligently estimate their total, but it was certain to be many tens of billions of dollars. The specter of unending and unlimited losses terrified existing names and scared away prospects. Many names opted for bankruptcy; some even chose suicide.

From these shambles, there came a desperate effort to resuscitate Lloyd’s. In 1996, the powers that be at the institution allotted £11.1 billion to a new company, Equitas, and made it responsible for paying all claims on policies written before 1993. In effect, this plan pooled the misery of the many syndicates in trouble. Of course, the money allotted could prove to be insufficient – and if that happened, the names remained liable for the shortfall.

But the new plan, by concentrating all of the liabilities in one place, had the advantage of eliminating much of the costly intramural squabbling that went on among syndicates. Moreover, the pooling allowed claims evaluation, negotiation and litigation to be handled more intelligently than had been the case previously. Equitas embraced Ben Franklin’s thinking: “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall hang separately.”
That's two of the letter's twenty-one pages. I encourage you to read the rest.

[Gulfstream]

Cross-posted from my other blog.

Mar. 1st, 2007

jake

Watch Now Revisited

Reihan Salam reviews Netflix's Watch Now service in Slate. Basically, he sees it as a great concept with some serious technological and content problems to work out. Of course, he also says:
I will note here that my Netflix habits are unconventional. During my early days as a Netflix subscriber, I spent anywhere from 1 to 3 hours a night watching DVDs on fast forward with the subtitles on. Because I read fairly quickly, I was able to follow twists and turns at high speed, thus increasing my cultural literacy in record time. This is impossible with Watch Now. To fast-forward, you grab the slider and drag it to the right, then wait. It's more like teleporting than running at high speed.

Um, yeah. Most people rent movies to, you know, watch them--not just to get the Cliff's Notes version. (This also goes a long way to explain why he doesn't have a problem with the "sub-DVD" image quality--he isn't watching movies for anything but the dialogue and plot, so who cares how it looks?)

Read the rest in my other blog.

Feb. 28th, 2007

jake

Bring Back Free Clicking!

Man, I'm really glad someone wrote this.

Short summary: the NY Times has implemented a new function where double-clicking on any word on the site (i.e., not links, just regular text) makes a new window pop up with a helpful definition of the word. This includes such words as "the," "green," and "Spanish." For those of us who semi-compulsively mess around with the text we read, this is a disruptive disaster. Thus the campaign to bring back free clicking. Please consider passing this along to your many friends and encouraging them to do the same, until we bring the paper of record to its east-coast liberal knees.

Cross-posted from my other blog.

Feb. 23rd, 2007

jake

HBO: Cinemax's Respected Older Brother

As someone about to cancel HBO (since my 6 months of cheapness runs out next month), this story in Good Magazine was of especial interest to me.
âœI think that when your sole goal is to be good,â Strauss says, âœwhen everyone whoâ™s working there has that frame of reference, then, right away, youâ™re dealing with something special. That may be a little bit different than when your goal is to sell ad time, or drive up ratingsâ”not that ratings arenâ™t important to us, they are important to usâ”but we live in a world where what weâ™re selling is HBO.â In other words, HBO is selling quality; and to sell it, it has to achieve it.

Amazingly, HBO gets its quality points even if no one is watching. HBOâ™s single most critically acclaimed series is not The Sopranos, but The Wire, which gets a fraction of the ratings of the mob drama. David Baldwin, HBOâ™s executive VP of program planning, breaks it down: âœWe donâ™t have to have mass, broad audience hits. Because I have one segment of my audience base that do think [The Wire] is absolutely brilliant, and will not miss it, and thatâ™s a large part of their faith in HBO: that we could make something like thisâ”the story of why urban America is failingâ”that no one else would touch.â
Worth a read.

[via Fimoculous]

Cross-posted from my other blog.

jake

I think we're going to need a new term for this one.

Yes, that is "I Think I Need a New Heart," by the Magnetic Fields, in a commercial for DOG FOOD. This has got to be a wry commentary on capitalism or something. Either that, or Stephin Merritt died and left his estate to Richard Milstein.

Cross-posted from my other blog.

Jan. 29th, 2007

NO TOUCHING!

The day I made a waitress cry*

There's a crappy little bar near my apartment that has a pretty sweet dinner deal--two-for-one burgers and appetizers every evening. So if you go with an even number of people, and everyone gets burgers, dinner's half price. They offer lots of different burgers, all for reasonable prices (even before the discount), and if you want to substitute a chicken breast or a veggie burger you can do so at no extra charge. And, shockingly, their burgers are pretty good.

As a student without a whole lot of equity, cheap eating is a priority for me, so I've been a frequent two-for-one burgerer. It's a great deal and two blocks away--sure beats cooking. My favorite burger to order is the grilled cheeseburger, which is exactly what you would expect--a burger patty in the middle of a grilled cheese sandwich. It's a real insider order, too, since it's not listed with the rest of the burgers (I guess because it's not on a regular bun)--it's under the "Sandwiches" heading instead. Anyway, it's freaking delicious, and you don't have to waste any valuable chewing time on vegetables.

Okay, so on to the story. (Incidentally, this story is pretty boring for a while, but I encourage you to stick with it. Two-thirds through I turn into a real dickhead.)

To read the rest of this post, click here.

Jan. 3rd, 2007

jake

A selection of excerpts with a brief response.

Home Depot CEO Robert Nardelli suddenly stepped down today.
Analysts said Nardelli's surprise resignation was almost certainly due to the fact that he had become a lightning rod for critics of hefty corporate executive pay. They said the Home Depot board was under great pressure to make a change.

At a disastrous Home Depot annual meeting last May, Nardelli, the only director present, refused to answer questions or respond to criticism from shareholders about the hundreds of millions in pay, benefits and stock options he had pulled down since he took over leadership of the chain in 2000. During his tenure, Nardelli earned some $240 million in salary, bonuses and stock options.
. . .
[Nardelli] will walk away with a severance package of $210 million, the company announced.
Well, that should certainly quiet the critics.

Full story here.

Nov. 15th, 2006

jake

UPS, You're on Notice!

My dear friend over at Supine Fever just wrote about a pretty nearly universal experience she's had with UPS (link here):
I ordered something off of ebay, and it was due to arrive last Friday. The UPS guy only delivers to my area during the “After 5pm” timeslot, and I was at work Friday night, so I got home to a yellow slip saying they’d be back at the same time Monday.

So, I looked forward to my awesome new ebay It all weekend. Monday came, and I rushed home a few minutes early from my internship so that I could be home at 5pm on the dot, and sweet Mary mother of God, the yellow slip was on the door, saying they had come at 4:45. I was incensed. Incensed!
This is, without question, a total mess--the kind of customer service disaster that I think really hurts big businesses all the time (see also: cable companies, phone companies, cell phone companies, banks, etc). Why aren't these corporations interested in doing the extra 5% of work it would require to make life better and easier for their customers? ESPECIALLY since doing so would make them stand up in stark contrast to their competition.

There's more.